Main

March 14, 2008

Your Taxes are Going UP Again

US Capitiol Building.jpgOur leaders on Capitol Hill demonstrated just why their approval ratings are so low by pinching more of your hard earned money today. They voted to spend even more of your (and my) money and continue their drunken-sailor-in-a-whorehouse impression. Sadly, it wasn’t even close, at 71-29. As our economy shows every sign of slowing, our politicians are once again demonstrating their complete lack of understanding of anything remotely economic, by raising both taxes and spending.

Too many pols seem convinced that we can tax ourselves into prosperity, when history has shown just the opposite. They will continue to pull more money out of the private sector (You know, the part of the economy that creates productive jobs), so they can divert it to the government, who will spend it less efficiently and create nothing in the way of economic growth in the process. Create new businesses that employ people, develop new products, processes and technologies, and put America back into economic health? Why no, that might require us to CUT Taxes.

If you’ve ever heard politicians bellyache about how much tax cuts cost, you’ll understand why they just don’t get it. They’re looking at your money as their money. From where I’m sitting, tax cuts don’t cost, they save (taxpayer’s money). At least the Senate endorsed continuing $340 billion of the tax cuts. Our fine congressional members in the House, on the other hand, want to expand domestic programs and hike our taxes by letting every one of the tax cuts expire. They just don’t get it…….


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

January 24, 2008

- American Fortune

converse allstars basketball shoes.jpgAmericans are unbelievably fortunate. That point was driven home while in the car, listening to Mike and Mike in the Morning on ESPN Radio this morning. They were interviewing basketball coach Ron Hunter of Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Coach Hunter is working with a charity called Samaritan's Feet, which is dedicated to providing shoes for children around the world who have never owned a pair of shoes. Stop and think about for just a second, please. We are so fortunate, and take so many things for granted, while there are kids who have never known the comfort of walking in a pair of shoes, something Americans (and citizens of just about every other developed country) take for granted.

The coach is dedicating his game tonight, which he'll coach sans footwear, to raise awareness for the charity, with the goal of getting 40,000 pairs of shoes, which he will personally deliver to the kids. Coach Hunter definitely has a knack for publicity, because his campaign appears to be an unqualified success. A Converse executive even appeared on the show to donate 15,000 pairs. LA Gear had earlier donated over 5,000 pairs. If you'd like to help out the kids on this one, find out more about the how to give shoes here.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

January 18, 2008

- Where the Real Superbowl Action Is - It's Not on the Field

gold coin stack.jpg$9.07 Billion. That's a positively huge amount of money. What's it for? Well, you could buy 2 Nimitz class nuclear aircraft carriers and have enough left over for 4,250 new Cessna 172 Skyhawks, complete with Garmin GPS, to fly off of them. I don't think you could fit 2,100 Cessnas on each one, but you get the point. In any case, that's about 10% of all such aircraft produced since production began in 1955.

According to cost figures from a University of Kentucky study, you could build your own, private 67 mile long Interstate Highway. Maybe you'd like to do something a bit more charitable. You could buy 30 nice, new, 250 bed, suburban hospital facilities, and locate them in the communities of your choice. You like cars? Well, you could have one hell of a car collection with that much money. In fact you could pick up a couple of motorcycles too. That $9.07 billion would buy just about every vehicle produced by the Honda Motor Corp. for the first 3 quarters of 2007.

What are people spending so much money on? Well, betting on the Superbowl, of course. About $90.7 million was spent on legal betting on last year's Superbowl in Nevada sports books alone. By some estimates, this accounts for roughly 1% of all action seen on the game. Simple math reveals that people drop about $9.07 billion betting on the big game. Wow! How much of that is illegal gambling? The majority of it, although much of this illegal money changes hands in office pools throughout America, and is wagered by people who seldom bet on much else. Gambling has been legalized in many communities throughout the country. The benefit, or lack thereof, of such gaming is a subject for another discussion, however only Nevada has legalized sports betting.

Since Nevada's sports books raked in only $90.7 million, the remainder is illegal. I never knew there were so many crooks in this country. The FBI estimates there may be as much as (are you firmly seated?) $380 Billion bet on sports every year in this country alone. A 10% tax on that would take care of a few things, you can be sure. Cure for cancer anyone? Mars mission? Give it all away to cure poverty? Hold on, are you insane? Giving money away on a regular basis never cures poverty, it only makes people dependent, and in most cases, less likely to ever become self sufficient. Sadly, that huge amount of money would probably only swell state and federal coffers, get the government beneficiaries of such largess accustomed to sucking at yet one more teat, and eventually be frittered away, leaving precious little benefit for you and me.

Have a great weekend, and keep trying to get Debt Free.




Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

October 30, 2007

- What Happens When Companies Will No Longer Accept Cash?

Cash Machine.jpgApple, in an apparent bid to deny product shortages and hacking for the holidays, said yesterday that they'd not allow more than 2 iPhone sales per customer. More interesting is that they will not be allowing customers to use greenbacks to make their iPhone purchases, only credit cards. One assumes that a debit card with a credit card logo may be used as well. It brings up an interesting point. Are we on our way to the all cash society that so many have suspected?

There are already many things that you can't buy with actual cash, and I'm sure that Uncle Sam would love to rid themselves of the hassle and expense of printing money. Of course we'd get no kind of tax relief even if they were saving money, they'd just find somewhere else to spend it, I'm sure. Many government officials would love to rid the world of cash for the law enforcement benefits it would provide. It would be much harder to launder money (but the really large Criminal enterprises would still do it), make illegal drug and weapons transactions, not report income for tax purposes, and so on. And you can just forget about that extra $50 your wife doesn't know about...

Many banks would love to only make electronic transactions and take their little electronic cut from each. That would streamline their operations, minimize their labor costs, allow smaller branch offices, and reduce product (money) handling and distribution expenses. The cash machine wouldn't be, a cash machine, that is. When visiting the bank, you'd just bring in your pay check, if you don't have electronic deposit, and they'd fill your debit card, just as they do now. There would be no option for getting cash back.

The reality is that most companies will never want to get rid of cash unless they have no choice. Businesses, Apple and a few other companies (Macy's) notwithstanding, will want to maximize their payment options in order to maximize revenue. The exception to this is when it costs more to make the transaction than the incremental revenue the added transaction generates for the business. In most cases, maximizing payment options will allow the business to appeal to the widest range of customers, and thus generate the maximum amount of total revenue. So, if it's only up to the business community, don't count on cash going away any time soon, unless cash transactions are rendered prohibitively expensive. If that day ever comes, look out, dodos will be using cash to line their nests.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

October 18, 2007

- Other Bloggers - Page Scrapers Becoming Too Great of a Problem?

Evidently you can make big money with page scraping blogs. I knew that they were big business, and have a few that regularly scrape my content. I was unaware how many are actually doing so until my post last night about how your business can make money from marketing waste products, or refining its marketing strategy to allow profit from heretofore unprofitable parts of the business.
 
Wow! There must have been some profitable keywords in there, such as “make money”, or maybe the Chinese scrapers are just working overtime. I had over 40 new links on Technorati this morning from blogs with no or 1 authority and upon checking, found that they just republished all or a large portion of my original post on my Debt Free blog. At least they're giving a link back to Debt Free. It makes you wonder how many are not? Original content? Why not just scrape some off the blogosphere? Will bloggers have to turn off their feeds?

Have a great, Debt Free morning. Actual post to follow.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

August 15, 2007

- ANother Debt Free Thought of the Day - What Things Cost

Here's another Debt Free thought of the day:

Methinks one should always should examine closely the concept of risk vs. cost. Maybe a look at the balance between not only the risk vs. cost, but what's risked. The risk may be very slight, and the cost great, but if that which is risked is infinitely precious, then almost any cost is worth paying. (Except freedom, see Ben Franklin) 


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

August 02, 2007

- Today's Money Thought

Today's Debt Free money thought:

The government's job is to promote the general welfare, not provide it in the form of a check.

 

Condolences out to those who lost loved ones in the bridge collapse in MN. 


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

June 23, 2007

- Look Out! This CAFE Will Make You Sick

Maybach 62.jpgHere we have yet another example of legislators legislating without regard to the unintended (possibly?) consequences of their actions. In a move that will be sure to cost thousands of Americans their jobs, and set back our already foundering auto industry even further, our Senate went all out in an attempt to reduce their historically low approval numbers even lower. By passing a new energy bill containing revised CAFE standards, our enlightened body ensured future members will have to answer the question sure to be asked by their constituents; “Why the hell am I unemployed?” According to the 2002 AEO report from the U.S. DOE, the net effect of the proposed standards will be a loss of 214,000 non-agricultural jobs in the short term. Eventually the economy is predicted to fully recover. If you're one of those 214K, that may not make much difference, however. 

Although the bill passed the Senate by a wide margin, 65-27, it has yet to pass the house or the president's desk. Maybe he can pull out one of his (far too rare) vetos. Here is one area where the market will do a great job on its own. We will do just fine controlling the fuel economy of our vehicles without congressional members sticking their noses into an area where they have neither the expertise nor the directive to be sticking.

For those that aren’t sure what the hell the whole CAFÉ thing is and why an eatery should elicit such venom, C.A.F.E is the corporate average fuel economy. It’s a mileage figure that, as the name suggests, an auto manufacturer's vehicles are required to meet. It currently stands at the same place it's been since the first Die Hard movie, 27.5mpg.

As fuel prices increase substantially, consumers will turn to more fuel efficient vehicles on their own, with out congress legislating their personal choice right out the window. Witness the sales figures for hybrids, light trucks and SUVs so far this year. According to R.L Polk, the information source of record for all things vehicle related, sales of hybrid vehicles for Q1 2007 increased a healthy 31% over the same quarter of 2006, while new car dealers sat on a whopping 102 day supply of new Chevy Silverado pickups.

The proposed CAFE number is 40% higher than the existing standard by the year 2020. From the manufacturer's perspective, it's actually even higher as the current 27.5 mpg standard doesn't include trucks and SUVs, which are required to attain only 22mpg. The new standard makes no such distinctions, and so is even tougher to attain than it would first appear. In addition, beginning this year, the EPA milage figires are being revised to more closely reflect the kind of mileage you can expect, instead of the, uh, optimistic figures we’ve experienced in the past.

While it’s certainly well within reach, is this economy goal realistic? Who will pay to meet the new standards? You will, of course. There will be a price to be paid on the dealer's lot and possibly in safety, to meet the new standards. In addition, the healthy power output we've been enjoying from our new vehicles is sure to be reduced dramatically. For those of you that thought the high performance car was dead in 1979, you may be right this time around.

Our vehicles could get much better fuel economy right this minute, if that was the type of vehicle you, as consumers wanted to buy. One only needs to look at the average vehicle leaving the dealership these days to see that it would be no stretch to grab a few extra mpg without breaking a sweat. Two main predictors of fuel economy, horsepower and weight, are up substantially from 20 years ago. According to the U.S. DOT the average new car in 1978 weighed in at 2805 lbs. For model year 2004, the same figure jumped to 3235.

This, despite the growing use of materials such as carbon fiber, other lightweight materials, and computer optimized designs. Simultaneously, horsepower, that elixir of driving fun, rose from 3.43hp/100 lbs in 1981 to 5.54 in the 2004 model year. Without the effect of modern electronics and power plant design, fuel economy figures would be truly abysmal. It really says something that modern vehicles, using basically highly developed versions of 100 year old power plants, can be so laden with heavy options, yet perform as well as they do.

There is a definite safety cost to reducing vehicle weight. A study by the National Academy of Sciences indicated that the downsizing in vehicles in the 1970's and 1980's, likely caused between 1,300 and 2,600 motor vehicle deaths in 1993. There have been substantial safety improvements since that time, ironically, given the tone of this post, many have been legislated. However, the reduction of weight will cause vehicle crashes to be more deadly. This will partially offset by the increased ability of a lighter vehicle to avoid crashes because of their greater agility and shorter stopping distances.

We can only hope the technologies required to meet these new fuel economy goals will be developed here, using American engineering talent. It will be a real shame if not only do we lose tens of thousands of high paying manufacturing jobs, we fail to capitalize on the opportunity to create new industries and technologies. Let’s hope we are not driving small, lethargic technological wonders we can not afford to pay for, developed by the growing cadre of “smart guys” working in the engineering firms of China and India. It's your money!


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

April 30, 2007

Monday Morning Rants

Here are a couple of Monday morning rants:

Rant #1 –
Undocumented is what happens when you forget your driver’s license when you head to the mall. Undocumented is not what happens when you sneak across the border into another country illegally.

Rant #2 –
Rosie should hop into her carbon spewing private jet with her pistol toting private bodyguard and head to Oakland, where she could view first hand the effects of burning fossil fuel on structural steel. Rosie, and all the rest of you celebrities who profess to be paragons of authority and virtue on economics, environmental science, and engineering, unless you are actually educated in those subjects, shut the F up. Quit using your mastery of oratory to convince us poor plebs you are a master of other subjects. It would be easier to take if you all followed your own advice instead of living in huge, resource consuming residences, and traveling about, this way and that, in private jets at your every whim. Oh, and Rosie, there are several thousand combat vets who have been on ships at sea that are constructed of structural steel that can attest to the effects of aviation fuel fires on its structural integrity.

Actual personal finance to follow.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

February 28, 2007

et tu Al?

sasquatch.jpgOnce again, the hypocrisy rolls on. It's another case of “Do as I say, not as I do.” from those that would seek to control our behavior while they do little to control theirs. In this case, one of the leaders of said movement, Al Gore, has been caught red handed in a bit of Inconvenient Truth. For Al the Inconvenient Truth is that he's an energy hog of the first order, all the while stressing to those of us in the consumptive public that we should consume less of everything lest our carbon emissions destroy the earth.

How much does Al consume? At just one of his homes, all larger than the average home most of us reside in, he averages 18,414 kWh per month in electricity alone. You and I average 10,656 KWH annually, according to the U.S. DOE. If you're thinking “Wow, those hot tub parties must really be hot.” he heats those with gas, as you can discern from his equally outrageous natural gas bills, averaging over $1,000 each and every month. I'm not exactly a model of conservation when it comes to gas use. I enjoy long, hot showers that I'm sure consume more than my fair share (Who the hell determines what that is, anyway??) of the stinky, invisible fuel, but I can assure you that my natural gas bills never approach that esteemed figure. That says nothing of the carbon emissions produced by the transportation he takes advantage of while jetting and limoing to the various events and recreational opportunities he regularly attends.

Now, I could give a rat's a** how much energy Mr. Gore consumes, how many large homes he owns, or how resource intensive they are to build and operate. I actually applaud him for achieving that station in life where he can avail himself of those trappings of the good life. What riles me up is that he does this while preaching to all who would listen, and a fair number who would rather not, that we are in a crisis of the first order and should curtail our consumption of natural resources before it spells doom for us all. It got me wondering how many others there are in our midst who would rather witness to the flock the dangers we present to civilization and “The Planet” from our activities, while they live like Czars and Pharaohs.

You've Leo, out there in the hills outside of LA in his 10,000+ square foot house. At least he's got plenty of parking for his Prius. He and the rest of the carbon sasquatchs out there, such as Mr. Gore are actually doing laudable work in an attempt to wean us off fossil fuels, curtail emissions and yank us away from our foreign oil addiction. I applaud them for actually trying to help. What I object to is the hypocrisy associated with it. Living in a home that burns that much energy while railing at me to keep the thermostat dialed back in my 1,400 square foot estate? Why can't he just live in a 5,500 square foot house on the golf course if would like to live a little better? After all, that should be enough space for one couple. As for the entertaining excuse, please, there are innumerable private clubs and fine hotels throughout this land where the enlightened among us could hold fund raisers and soirees.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

November 14, 2006

When Will It All Stop???

Just one moment for a sad, diversionary rant, that has little to do with your finances. Yesterday morning, a Seattle police officer, Elizabeth Mary Nowak, 30, was killed. No, she wasn't saving a child from a fire, or stopping a bank robbery in progress. She was killed when a 20-time convicted felon, driving a stolen car, T-boned her while running through an intersection at 2:00am, with his lights off. It was probably hard to avoid him, since he was traveling around 80mph in a 30mph zone. She was off duty, heading to the precinct to begin her shift.

It was a sad anniversary of sorts, being 3 months to the day since a very similar scenario took the life of another Seattle cop, Joselito Barber, 26. The officer was also hit in an intersection by a career criminal. He was on duty, coincidentally at the same precinct as Elizabeth Nowak, when a woman plowed into him while high on crack cocaine. He had little chance of surviving the impact created by the GMC Yukon flying along at over 75mph. She was also running a red light in a 30mph zone. At least she had her lights on. As with the piece of trash who struck and killed Nowak, she had a long history of felony convictions. At the time of the crash, she had 4 outstanding warrants for her arrest. Although, if her past history were to be any indication, she'd be right back out on the street, threatening everyone's life and property. To make matters worse, she had been released from the Department of Corrections drug rehabilitation program only 10 days before she caused the death of Officer Barber.

Why were these two pieces of dirt even on the streets, after both being convicted of multiple felonies? Is 20 convictions not enough? Apparently not for the judicial system in King County and the State of Washington. When would be enough to trigger some sort of threshold that would keep such long term offenders behind bars? Both offenders were participants in a program known as the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA). A DOSA sentence allows the offender to be released early if they agree to participate a drug treatment and rehabilitation program. It must be frustrating, as member of the law enforcement community, to realize that after endangering yourself to arrest these type of scum and get them off the streets for the safety of the community, there's a great chance you'll get to repeat the process in short order.

Now, I am sure there are those who are helped by such programs. They probably have their place in the criminal justice system. Not being an expert in such matters, I can not be sure. One thing I am fairly sure of however, is that the place for such programs does not extend to career criminals with 20 priors. They are a lost cause, and need to be removed from society permanently for public safety and security. There should be no arguments, discussions or other diversions on this subject. Such individuals have demonstrated, consistently and repeatedly, their propensity to re-offend. DOSA will do little to alter this behavior pattern. It's only a matter of time before the “progressive” mindset that allows such alternative sentences to occur will contribute to yet another senseless tragedy. I only hope it's not a mother walking her babies down the street who is hit and killed next time.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting

October 17, 2006

Opportunity

flag and capitol.jpgIncome redistribution, the darling of those on the left, isn't what America needs. America's not about that. As our population crosses the three hundred million mark, we need opportunity redistribution, not income redistribution. We need opportunity for every American, not for everyone who happens to reside within our borders, however they arrived here. This country has been built upon the kind of opportunity available nowhere else in the world. “The streets are paved with gold” used to be the cry from those throughout the world. Consequently, there's been a stream of fresh talent coming to our country since it was founded. That tremendous talent, coupled with an enlightened societal framework, rampant industriousness, and a desire to be Americans, built the great nation we find ourselves in today.

As we drift ever more to the left each year, driven by undeserved guilt and misplaced social conscience, the fabric of a unified society that built the nation is slowly being dissolved into a morass of differing cultures. Differing cultures are one of the key factors that built our nation, but these cultures were melded into the nation we call America. This drive to come together and form a single, great nation is gradually dissolving. Those who come here today have less desire to assimilate and haven't the opportunity for immersion in American culture that immigrants had in the past. We are losing our national identity, to the glee of the amateur social engineers who fancy themselves the architects of America's future.

Every nation, no matter how great, has always fallen. Never before in history has there been one that has offered it's citizens the wide range of opportunities that are arrayed before Americans. Let's make sure the offer is always on the table. It's up to us.


Hosted by Yahoo! Web Hosting